How do Americans view Brit startups?

How do Americans view British startups? Quaint would be a good description..

About 10 years ago I got friendly with a Boston VC (dammit why didn’t we have cloud based address books and LinkedIn then that way I’d remember my “long tail” of contacts) and I asked him exactly this question – how do you view the Brits?

He came back with an anecdote which captures the mind set perfectly. He told me he was being pitched for an investment by a local Boston based startup whom he asked the question of “who’s you’re closest competitor” to which the response was “it’s a Brit company, they’re working part time to catch up”.

Which is an interesting perception. I do think US startups spend a lot more time in the office that Brit startups but I question how much of that time is spent around the water cooler….

I don’t think Linkdex have this problem though. I spend a lot of my time in the US and I think our cousins like my aggressive ballsy attitude.

Perhaps I should have been born an American, although I love England dearly despite what Mr Brown has done to it :-(

Big advice to Brit startups. Spend a week a month in Silicon Valley. Let them think you’re a Brit living in the US. I promise you’ll get ROI.

Posted in Startups, VC | Leave a comment

Matching Your Link Strategy With Your Link Media Increases Performance

An ENORMOUS amount of SEO/PR time is wasted because media prospect lists are rarely strategy specific.

How many times have you worked your way down a target list of potential partner domain and found that your strategy is not going to work with the site you’re looking at then closed the tab and moved on to the next prospect?

However, did you know that with most strategies there are filters that can be applied to help increase the probability of reviewing sites that will give you a strategy match.

Continue reading

Posted in SEO | Leave a comment

On Google and China

On Google and China

Firstly let me state that I think Google is doing the right thing to make a stand against state intervention in the net.

But I do wonder. Is this a convenient place to be for Google in more than one respect?

China search revenues are expected to be $650m this year. Google has around a  35% market share and revenues in China of $210m. Which is around 1% of Googles total revenue.

Add to this that the last Google China CEO, Kaifu Lee, left in 2009 reportadly saying that Google would never become the No.1 search engine in China and one could come to the conclusion that it would be commercially a good thing for Google to exit China.

Another VC conversation a few nights ago brought out the opinion that China is THE market to go for – but lets remember the the wealth is polarized in China – it may be growing hard but its only a few that have the wealth – its “narrow shouldered” personal wealth unlike the West which is “broad shouldered”

It all stacks up. Costs of spidering and storing the Chinese web combined with the costs of running local Chinese offices mean that Google is probably loosing money on it. In addition the China Syndrome must occupy head space of senior Google execs during a time when the are focusing on a lot of dev stuff in the pipeline.

Good commercial move Google.

Stats courtesy of Techcrunch and the Daily Telegraph (want to see a publishers site that really gets search? Go visit telegraph.co.uk)

Posted in Google | Leave a comment

Planning a media landscape to find linking partners that drive rankings and clicks

Influence Finder uses a trillion link databases and page crawlers to find relevant and influential link partners for you.

The problem with having a huge webmap and the ability to search source code for keywords in specific places like the page title, external link anchor, internal link anchor and 20 or so more places is, if you put garbage in, you get garbage out.

For those of you who are on the beta program of Influence Finder you will know what I mean when I talk about the need to understand what you want to get out of a project to really unlock the software full potential.

This has meant spending time talking beta users through:

  • How projects should be planned, all of the possible uses of data that is rich in valuable information.
  • What the presence of keywords in strategic places tell you, in both an explicit and an implied way.
  • How individuals and teams can make the most of their most precious resource – time, to maximize output.

So here are a few key thoughts, strategies and findings that we’ve put together that I don’t mind sharing with everyone.

I am going to split this into 3 posts, so you may want to subscribe via Twitter or RSS to ensure you don’t miss the next couple.

Plan a media landscape

Whether you’re using google link commands, tools like SEOMoz’s Linkscape, Yahoo Site Explorer or our software, Influence Finder, having a clear objective for the project or suite of projects you’re going to run is key.

So for example, an SEO with a brand like Toyota given the task of targeting the hybrid car market might construct a suite of reports that will combine to create a media landscape. Here’s a graphic to explain.

Building A Media Landscape
Here are the stages:
1. Own Brand – Knowing who has linked to a brand before helps an SEO and PR know whom to talk to again when there’s a story to run. There may not be a huge volume of domains to engage with but the conversion will be high.

2. Competitors – If you then do the same exercise for your direct competitors you’ll gather a big slice of the media landscape with a high conversion.

3. Vertical Media – If you then take a look at the key media influencers in that vertical you’ll get a wider slice of media landscape talking about that topic. In this case I looked for the top blogs in a category in Technorati.

4. Interested Media – Now this is where you need to think more laterally. The types of site that may be interested in a hybrid car may talk about other related environmental topics, but still be open to a new hybrid car story. The conversion is lower, but if you could narrow your efforts to the influential ones the rewards could be there.

Now you’ve got a huge media landscape, with hundreds of thousands of URL’s you’re going to need to narrow the list to find those that will ‘show you the money’. Which is something I’d like to talk about in more detail next week.

Please comment away on this as it’s an area we can all learn more about through debate. It’s also an area that is not discussed that much.

Posted in InfluenceFinder, SEO | Leave a comment

On Venture Capital and Value Add

I was recently an innocent bystander at a discussion about the success or failure of the European VC business between our VC (Laurence John of Amadeus Seed) and our Chairman, Tony Everett.

I was slightly taken aback to hear from both that they considered that, overall, European VC had failed. The prevailing view was that VC’s had simply invested cash without investing value add and helping steer their investments towards an exit.

As an entrepreneur I have to say that my default expectation is that I would expect a strong level of value add from a VC. Apparantly I am set to be dissapointed.

A subsequent conversation with François Mazoudier (another startup entrepreneur turned VC) indicated  I am going to be sorely dissapointed. His view was that most VC’s dont have the time to add value because of the volume of investments they make and the amount of fire fighting they do.

Well, so far I am actually not dissapointed. Rather the opposite. We have two VC’s in Linkdex and they both reek of value add. Laurence John could add value to a brick. My team is continually amazed by his insight. We also have the fabulous Dave Mclure (congrats on the new fund Dave) as a private investor and, just for his address book alone, he adds huge value.

So I am prepared to be disappointed in the future. But then perhaps not. We have a plan, we have a team and we know where we’re going and how to get there. We’re not dependent on value add. We don’t need it but it’s like sat nav on a new car – it’s a nice to have accessory.

Posted in VC | Leave a comment

My interview with Webmaster Radio last week

Announcing the beta for SearchDNA (update – now called InfluenceFinder) this is a comprehensive interview with Jim at Webmasterradio

Posted in InfluenceFinder, News | Leave a comment